Tag: Channing Tatum

  • Hail, Caesar!: A big swing and even bigger miss

    Hail, Caesar!: A big swing and even bigger miss

    Joel and Ethan Coen don’t owe us anything.

    The writing/directing brothers and masterminds behind some of cinema’s best films over the last few decades – from The Big Lebowski and Fargo to No Country For Old Men and Burn After Reading – are allowed a pass every once in a while to take a big swing for the fences on a prestige picture and miss.

    Hail, Caesar! is a huge swing and an even bigger miss.

    In the big-budget Hollywood movie about big-budget Hollywood making big-budget Hollywood movies, we find Josh Brolin star as Eddie Mannix, a Michael Clayton-esque fixer who keeps the scandals of his top actors out of the press in a vague 1950s Los Angeles.

    Since the film is ostensibly centered around Mannix, viewers are propelled alongside Brolin as he ping-pongs from one studio lot to the next, fixing issues with major stars and directors to try and keep a theatrical adaptation of a smash Broadway play, a cowboy western, an aquatic musical, and an Roman epic on par with Spartacus on track.

    If that’s not enough, his biggest film’s biggest lead – George Clooney’s Baird Whitlock, star of film within a film Hail, Caesar! – has been kidnapped by an unknown group of rogue who may or may not be Communists.

    Clocking in at well under two hours, Caesar! attempts to cram far too much into far too little time, leaving major stars like Scarlett Johansson and Jonah Hill with nothing more than extended cameos as a Esther Williams-type actress trying to hide her illegitimate pregnancy and a studio stooge, respectively.

    This doesn’t even begin to question the decision to limit the screen time of Ralph Fiennes – perhaps Caesar’s best actor – who perfectly fits the comedic bill of what the Coens were trying to achieve with the film, their take on Wes Anderson’s fantastic The Grand Budapest Hotel.

    For what actually appears on screen, Clooney does the best work of the film as an over-the-top, neurotic and complicated version of a Kirk Douglas-type actor kidnapped by an organization known simply as “The Future.” Audiences are largely left waiting for Clooney to reappear on screen to advance the real major storyline of the film while the Coens have Mannix meander throughout Hollywood and question whether or not he enjoys his job.

    Channing Tatum offers an uneven performance as singing-dancing-acting triple threat Burt Gurney, a Gene Kelly knockoff starring in a picture about sailors about to go off to war. The musical number audiences see filmed midway through Caesar! is the single best scene in an otherwise muddled script and features Tatum at his finest since the original Magic Mike.

    If there’s a true winner in Hail, Caesar! – since it certainly isn’t audiences – it has to be Alden Ehrenreich, a relatively unknown actor with minor screen credits before landing the part of cowboy actor Hobie Doyle, the singin’, lasso tossin’, gee shucks-iest kind of actor around. His welcome fresh face among the talented cast of veteran actors is refreshing and Ehrenreich performs with gusto enough to call it a breakout performance.

    Visually, Caesar! works in the respect that everything feels vintage Hollywood, from the costuming to the sets and performances within each film. The 50’s vibe is definitely there, but the Coens don’t really seem to have a firm grasp on where they want to go with this movie, dragging viewers all over the place in order to come to a middling conclusion at the end.

    While there’s all the pieces for a fantastic film, nothing really seems to come together in Hail, Caesar! – an early favorite for the year’s most disappointing movie. From top to bottom, the entire production feels out of sync and in need of major structural repair to a confusing, all over the map script that holds Caesar! back from being something better.

    It’s massively frustrating to see some of Hollywood’s best talent wasted like this, but the Coens have earned a well-deserved pass like Hail, Caesar!

  • Magic Mike XXL: Quality, clothes stripped away in subpar sequel

    Magic Mike XXL: Quality, clothes stripped away in subpar sequel

    Calling something “XXL” implies bigger and better.

    Double entendre aside, the sequel to the 2012 indie smash hit “Magic Mike” was supposed to blow away female audiences over the Fourth of July weekend like a massive fireworks display.

    Moviegoers who came out to the Channing Tatum-helmed male stripper fiesta got their fireworks show, but “Magic Mike XXL” feels closer to the premature explosion from San Diego’s 2012 disaster when 20 minutes worth of fireworks went off in about 15 seconds.

    Somehow, someway this film got made as Tatum and writing partner Reid Carolin pieced together a couple of general scene ideas and crammed them into a buddy road trip movie.

    Tatum, whose “Magic Mike” character supposedly rode off into the sunset and left stripping behind at the end of the original, hops right back on the Kings of Tampa bandwagon within the first 15 minutes to join his old stripper buddies for “one last ride.”

    The last ride plot device, most often used at the tail end of fading action franchises, implies that many rides were had prior to the upcoming “last ride.”

    This isn’t yet another double entendre, which is surprising given it’s one of the few times in the film sexual or phallic imagery is subtly on display.

    If “Magic Mike” were to become a franchise, it’s already been crippled by this plot choice. How many more last rides can there be?

    Little of what made “Magic Mike” a surprise hit both critically and commercially remains in its “XXL” sequel.

    The domineering and captivating Matthew McConaughey is gone, taking the most memorable character in the upstart franchise with him.

    His loss alone is enough to cripple any potential follow-up, but things got worse for the sequel when “Magic Mike” director Steven Soderbergh opted not to return for a second go-round in the director’s chair.

    With the original “Magic Mike,” Soderbergh made a gritty, independent drama that just happened to center around the world of male strippers.

    The supersized version, if you will, under the direction of longtime assistant director Gregory Jacobs opts for style over substance, trading quality performances and well written scenes for gyrating hips and overly long dance sequences.

    It’s as if Soderbergh knew the magic of the original film couldn’t be replicated, getting out of the way before the stripper train derails off the tracks.

    Though it’s true Soderbergh is both cinematographer and editor under pseudonyms for “XXL,” it’s easy to tell that his heart’s just not in it.

    For all the progress that has been made over the last six months with powerful performances by women on screen, “Magic Mike XXL” undercuts that step forward with subpar, one-note efforts from a trio of actresses.

    Jada Pinkett Smith, who returns to the big screen for the first time since 2008, is a complete disaster as strip club owner/promoter Rome, who can’t bring substance to a character written for a suave male actor. Taraji P. Henson, rising star of television’s “Empire” would have been a much more worthy choice to fill the role.

    Amber Heard, the film’s obligatory romantic object, isn’t given much to work with, especially when the “meet-cute” scene finds her stumbling upon Tatum while he is urinating on the beach.

    For those wondering where ’90s rom-com star Andie MacDowell has been, look no further than “Magic Mike XXL,” where she drunkenly stumbles her way through an overly long scene as she and a group of aging women lust over the vagabond strippers.

    Everything about the scene — and the film as a whole — reeks of desperation, and not in a good way.

    Without McConaughey to ground the film or a substantive plot to pace it, “Magic Mike XXL” attempts to go big, but ultimately just goes home, where most people will ultimately screen the sub-par effort from the comfort of their couches.

  • Jupiter Ascending: Sci-flop not worth your time

    Jupiter Ascending: Sci-flop not worth your time

    It’s unfortunate that “Jupiter Ascending,” the latest sci-fi adventure from the Wachowski directing team of “Matrix” fame, wasn’t released last summer like originally scheduled.

    The film, which believes itself to be the second coming of the original “Star Wars” trilogy, is more like the Jar Jar Binks of the sci-fi genre, heavily derided, over-animated and just not that good.

    It certainly doesn’t seem like the extra seven months taken following its July 18 expected release date helped the overall aesthetic of the film.

    To be sure, “Jupiter Ascending” is a terrible film lacking in any semblance of character development, cohesive plot or sense of purpose.

    But films like “Jupiter Ascending” are necessary evils that remind us just how fortunate we are for movies like “Edge of Tomorrow” or “Guardians of the Galaxy,” science fiction films with an actual point of view and something interesting to hold on to.

    Or better still, “Jupiter Ascending” should make viewers more appreciative of Christopher Nolan’s space odyssey, “Interstellar,” which hits on a lot of the same plot points — previously home-bound hero rockets off into unknown worlds to save the people of Earth in a big-budget, special effects heavy adventure film.

    Everything that “Jupiter Ascending” doesn’t have going for it — quality acting performances, adept storytelling, cinematically beautiful visual effects — “Interstellar” has in spades.

    Nolan’s movie is a little long and pretty wordy, but there aren’t any flying dinosaur battles ripped from the excess pages of “Transformers: Age of Extinction.”

    Bad acting abounds in “Jupiter Ascending,” from Mila Kunis as the damsel in distress to her one-note savior, Channing Tatum.

    The worst offender, however, is Academy Award nominee Eddie Redmayne, who awkwardly whispers his way through the film like he’s hoping viewers don’t remember he’s the same actor who just won a BAFTA (British Academy) award for best actor as Stephen Hawking in “The Theory of Everything.”

    It’s plausible to think that producers believed the name recognition of Tatum and Kunis would be enough to get people in the door early and the $175 million they spent on special effects would keep buzz going.

    Except “Jupiter Ascending” is so bad, you won’t find yourself caring so much about the plight of the characters as much as how long before the film ends so you can go home.

    The biggest problem with this sci-fi dud is that it’s another poor outing for originality in filmmaking, strengthening the case for Hollywood producers to spend more money (and waste viewers’ time) with unnecessary sequels.