Tag: Mel Gibson

  • Hacksaw Ridge: What it means to serve

    Hacksaw Ridge: What it means to serve

    Unwavering heroism amidst the ravages of war is explored in Mel Gibson’s latest directorial effort “Hacksaw Ridge,” sure to be one of the year’s ten best feature films.

    Gibson expertly combines gruesome World War II era violence akin to Steven Spielberg’s classic “Saving Private Ryan” with dramatic underpinnings of faith, family and love for your fellow man that one might expect in a traditional faith-based movie.

    “Hacksaw Ridge” tells the true story of Desmond Doss, a Seventh Day Adventist who volunteers to serve in the Pacific during World War II despite being a conscientious objector who refuses to carry a weapon into battle. Doss overcame court-martial to serve his country at the Hacksaw Ridge offensive during the Battle of Okinawa, rescuing 75 men as a combat medic largely behind enemy lines.


    Andrew Garfield shines as Doss, a man imbued with unshakeable conviction for both his country and his nonviolent beliefs. “Hacksaw Ridge” is unquestionably the best work of Garfield’s career and, along with a stellar turn in last year’s “99 Homes,” marks a turning point past two films in the “Spiderman” franchise. While it could be easily said that “Hacksaw Ridge” is an incredible war film, Garfield’s expert portrayal of a man who refuses to fight but demands to serve elevates the performances of every actor around him and the movie as a whole.

    Hugo Weaving, who has largely slept-walked his way through films since his breakout as Agent Smith in “The Matrix” trilogy, comes alive opposite Garfield as Doss’s alcoholic, belligerent father racked with emotional guilt after being the only of his friends to survive two tours of duty during World War I. Many war films attempt to gloss over the home life of the soldiers they feature, but Gibson embraces the task head-on in limited, but well-acted scenes between Weaving and Garfield. Both actors perform flawlessly in developing the character of the man Doss was by hammering home how he came to be that man.

    Less successful in this respect is the film’s romantic interludes as Doss courts a local nurse named Dorothy (Teresa Palmer) who later becomes his wife. At first glance, it’s unclear whether the romance angle of “Hacksaw Ridge” falters due to script issues or Palmer’s bland, ineffective performance, but the on-screen couple have very little chemistry.

    Doss’s military superiors as played by “Avatar” star Sam Worthington and funnyman Vince Vaughn are unusual casting choices, but neither actor gets in the way of the overall film.

    “Hacksaw Ridge” is perhaps the most graphically violent World War II era war film since “Saving Private Ryan,” but Gibson relies on the authenticity of the conflict to drive home just how harrowing Doss’s story of heroism and survival genuinely was. With the lead character serving as a medic, it shouldn’t come as much surprise that the level of gore within “Hacksaw Ridge” is amplified by the length of time bodies with severed limbs are shown on screen. 

    Embracing violence has been a trademark of his films dating back to 1995’s “Braveheart,” but Gibson does a terrific job of approaching the ravages of war from a fresh perspective and is buoyed by Garfield’s strong individual effort. “Hacksaw Ridge” will likely stay in the Oscar conversation, but ultimately fall short due to the graphic violence and controversial nature of the film’s director. It would not be a surprise, however, to see Garfield’s work in the film honored as part of a nomination for his role in Martin Scorcese’s “Silence.”

    Doss’s tale of patriotic heroism is too important for mature audiences not to make an effort to see “Hacksaw Ridge” at least once and Gibson’s film will probably never look better than it does on the big screen. Even though it arrives in a highly charged political climate, the film opts to avoid definitely becoming a pro-war or anti-war piece and benefits greatly from its relative evenhandedness.

    While not a perfect film, “Hacksaw Ridge” will ultimately be remembered as one of Hollywood’s best World War II efforts and a must see for those capable of handling its brutality.

  • Mad Max Fury Road: Brutally carving roadmap to quality sequels

    Mad Max Fury Road: Brutally carving roadmap to quality sequels

    Two films espousing feminist ideas broke through in a big way commercially last week, but it’s the movie franchise you’d least suspect that does the best job of celebrating women in cinema.

    In fact, it’s just a better movie all the way around.

    Don’t look now, but George Miller, the director behind the Mel Gibson-led “Road Warrior” trilogy, is back with a new installment of “Mad Max” and its “Fury Road” is simply one of the three best films so far in 2015 and by far the year’s most feminist.

    It’s not earth-shattering if viewers haven’t seen the trilogy before heading to theaters for “Fury Road.” In fact, seeing the film with fresh eyes offers a richer perspective on this visually brilliant epic adventure.

    Tom Hardy — further cementing his status as both leading man and character actor — holds his own as the titular “Mad Max,” taking over where Gibson left off in the mid-1980s.

    It’s Charlize Theron, however, that really drives “Fury Road” with the year’s most powerful feminist performance, kicking ass and taking names as the Imperator Furiosa tasked with secreting five young breeding women away from a cult in a post-apocalyptic desert. The film leans heavily on agenda — some political, some ideological — while also putting female characters in places to shine in what would otherwise be male-driven films.

    Nicholas Hoult — previously best known as Beast in the latest “X-Men” installments — is unrecognizable as the War Boy Nux, teetering on the brink of insanity while somehow not falling all the way over. It’s by far the best performance by a supporting actor so far in 2015, even surpassing a classic Alan Alda performance in “The Longest Ride.”

    While the acting will help carry audiences through scene to scene, what really sets “Fury Road” apart is the work of Miller and cinematographer John Seale to bring the vivid pictures in Miller’s head to life on the big screen.

    Rarely is a film more visually dynamic on a shot to shot basis than “Fury Road,” which keeps viewers on sensory overload for a full two hours. The fact that Miller and stunt coordinator Guy Norris were able to achieve 90 percent of the stunts performed in the film without the aid of computer-generated imagery (CGI) is astounding.

    Watch “Fury Road” and then try to wrap your mind around the fact that Miller also directed “Babe” and the Academy Award-winning animated film “Happy Feet.”
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nr6wdTPGFmI
    To be sure, “Fury Road” is a highly demanding, heavy-metal rage inducing, bullet-to-the-head kind of film for mature audiences only. Miller’s post-apocalyptic action horror odyssey insists upon a rational and engaged audience like last year’s sci-fi adventure “Edge of Tomorrow” with Tom Cruise and Emily Blunt.

    In a cinematic world of sameness, “Fury Road” is Miller’s giant roadmap paving the way for directors to bring some originality to sequel-making. If Hollywood learns nothing else from “Fury Road,” this will still be a major step in the right direction for cinema.

    Audiences who enjoy, or even mildly tolerate, the plot and acting performances in “Fury Road” need to see the film a second time just to fully immerse themselves in the cinematic wasteland Miller creates in the most authentic way possible.

    The first time through, audiences can only experience the film through Miller’s broader strokes, scalding reds and soothing blues washed in the raging hormones of guitar-heavy white noise.

    It’s on the second viewing where audiences can truly appreciate the method to Miller’s madness.

    For a film cooking in Miller’s mind for nearly three decades, the wait is well worth it.