Category: Streaming

Reviews of films whose primary release is on a streaming service. Assign for streaming-origin releases, not simply because a theatrical film is later available online.

  • Roma: Memories of a childhood

    Roma: Memories of a childhood

    Mexican filmmaker Alfonso Cuarón returns with a stunning, yet melancholic film sure to dazzle audiences who catch his latest work, “Roma,” on the big screen.

    Dripping in contrast thanks to its harsh black-and-white cinematography, “Roma” is a rich and searing look into Cuarón’s mind through a portrait of his childhood, and yet, chances are you’re never going to get the full “Roma” experience.

    Purchased by Netflix as the streaming service’s premiere awards season contender, “Roma” has had a minor run theatrically in larger markets across the world before making its online debut Friday.

    While this has made the wonderful drama much more accessible to the average moviegoer, ninety percent of audiences for “Roma” will never experience the film as Cuarón intended, especially disappointing given the picturesque, 65mm black-and-white style used to shoot “Roma.”

    There are countless articles online that offer tips on how to configure televisions for optimal viewing of “Roma” for those inclined to get as close as they can to the real thing.

    Set over the course of a year in early 1970s Mexico, “Roma” follows Cleo, a young live-in housekeeper in the employ of a middle-class family living in Mexico City.

    Told in a lingering observational style for much of the film’s two-hour running time, “Roma” often relies on mood, non-verbalized emotion and framing to paint a broad picture of the struggles of two women, Cleo and Sofia, the matriarch of the family and mother to the four children in Cleo’s care.

    “Roma” is by no means an easy watch. There’s an expectation of supreme patience and observation on the part of the viewer to take in the artistry of Cuarón’s work that’s far easier to accomplish in a theater than on a home television or cell phone.

    First time actress Yulitza Aparicio wows with an understated, raw performance that feels effortless yet makes Cleo feel very lived in as a character. Her award-worthy turn feels especially natural due to the way Cuarón frames Aparicio in each shot, allowing audiences to peer inside Cleo’s innermost thoughts without Aparicio having to express them in dialogue.

    Marina de Tavira also stands out in limited screen time as Sofia, balancing compassion for Cleo with a wavering confidence she attempts to maintain for her children.

    The men of “Roma,” few and far between, are portrayed at a distance rather than the intimate closeness audiences feel in Cleo’s presence. This extends to the coldness of the performances themselves, where Fernando Grediaga as Sofia’s husband Antonio and Jorge Antonio Guerrero as Cleo’s boyfriend Fermin display a callousness rare to find in these sorts of family dramas.

    So much of “Roma” feels semi-autobiographical that Cuarón himself becomes the film’s true star despite never appearing on screen. Moments of clarity from memories past bring themselves to life through Cuarón’s art, much like a master painter leaving broad strokes for viewers to interpret.

    The most striking aspect of “Roma” is its technical achievements in visual and sound design.

    Cuarón steps behind the camera to do his own cinematography for the first time and displays expert craftsmanship over long panning shots that track movement fluidly and smoothly in a way that makes viewers take notice but does not distract from the action on screen.

    This is most evident in the film’s best scene, one continuous shot that follows Cleo and the children across a beach and into the ocean and back. There is an immediacy to the cinematography here that gives a floating effect, almost as if audiences are reflecting on a distant memory with vivid recollection.

    The same is true of the film’s expert sound mixing and design, which at first glance isn’t recognizable until voices or other sounds pull viewers’ gazes away from the screen only to realize what they thought they heard from around them was technical wizardry from “Roma.”

    The film is destined to garner Academy Award nominations across the board and is the clear frontrunner in the Best Foreign Language Film category this spring.

    A Best Picture nod is all but assured, though victory in that category is less likely than say, A Star is Born or Green Book, given the Oscars’ preferential balloting system for the category usually results in the most agreed upon good film rather than the best one.

    Netflix has placed all its weight behind Cuarón’s dynamic film in search of its first Best Picture win, though voters could opt to recognize Cuarón as Best Director to shut out the streaming service while still honoring “Roma” as a cinematic achievement.

    Worth seeing in any format, “Roma” is best when viewed on the biggest possible screen with the least amount of distractions. Patient audiences should be rewarded with one of the year’s best dramas from a master craftsman like Cuarón.

  • 22 July: Terrorism docudrama chillingly effective

    22 July: Terrorism docudrama chillingly effective

    Approaching real terrorism dramatically is difficult subject matter for filmmakers to handle properly.

    Whether it’s a faithful, authentic retelling like Clint Eastwood’s “The 15:17 To Paris” with the real heroes on screen or a more loose depiction like Peter Berg’s “Patriots Day,” there’s a great deal of care given to what and how the terror of catastrophic events and the terrorists who commit them are portrayed on screen.

    Writer/director Paul Greengrass takes a wholistic approach with his latest endeavor “22 July,” a sobering docudrama about right-wing extremism in Norway in the middle of 2011.

    A lone man, bent on ending Norway’s immigration entirely, bombed the prime minister’s office and then struck hours later, killing 69 students at a summer camp on a remote island outside Oslo.

    Greengrass refuses to shy away from the violence in his film, taking a stark 20 minute sequence to methodically recreate the carnage of Anders Behring Breivik from multiple perspectives.

    Audiences are thrust on both sides of the rifle barrel, watching helplessly as teens are gunned down with chilling callousness. “22 July” does not glorify the attack by any means, but the clinical approach Greengrass presents may come across as offensive to some viewers.

    There’s a stoic precision to Greengrass’s work as he abandons his signature shaky-cam cinematography made famous in the Jason Bourne franchise and “Captain Phillips.” Shots move crisply from point to point with rigor, less in a clinical approach than a militant efficiency.

    All the while, Greengrass draws out incredible performances from a talented Nordic cast led by Jonas Strand Gravli as Viljar, one of the teenage survivors, and Anders Danielsen Lie as Breivik.

    Gravli measures his performance in segments, flowing seamlessly from popular and carefree to panicked to emotionally broken as viewers watch Viljar over the course of the film.

    After the attack, Gravli turns in his best work, hiding Viljar’s pain but failing to shut out the aftershocks he constantly replays in his mind.

    The detachment in Lie’s expert portrayal of Breivik chills viewers to the bone in a terrifying, yet mesmerizing way. Lie achieves a strange glazed-over façade as if Breivik is maintaining some sort of trance that is both eerie and feels genuine to the man.

    “22 July” is a well acted ensemble film with solid turns from the entire cast, but especially Jon Øigarden as Breivik’s reluctant attorney conflicted between defending his client and confronting the atrocities before him.

    The film wanders between redemptive drama and legal procedural throughout its second half, but this never feels reductive or long-winded.

    Greengrass has made a career of finding political commentary in his cinema and this extends to “22 July” as well, but without the biting viciousness of Spike Lee’s “BlacKkKlansman.”

    Netflix has given “22 July” one of the company’s biggest theatrical releases and while that may translate to award season eligibility, Greengrass’s film will probably be shut out.

    If the film had been made in Norwegian instead of English, it certainly would have had a good chance at a foreign language Oscar nom but would still be far behind Alfonso Cuaron’s expected Oscar frontrunner “Roma,” a Netflix film debuting in December.

    “22 July” is a difficult watch, especially all at once. Perhaps Netflix is the perfect venue for the film, allowing for viewers to pause or skip ahead if necessary. It’s certainly one of Greengrass’s better films and an important one at that.