Category: Oscar Contenders

Oscar contenders, awards-season coverage, awards predictions, nominations, and ceremony analysis. Historical archive category retained at its original URL; use selectively for awards-relevant articles.

  • 2016: A Cinematic Year In Review

    2016: A Cinematic Year In Review

    It’s been a tough year.

    Just saying the word “2016” induces cringes from a vast majority of people, offering up painful thoughts of a highly divisive political campaign that may or may not have gone your way to general malaise about the state of the world to the seemingly endless rash of celebrity deaths that robbed us of talent far too soon.

    In the world of cinema, things got off to a rocky and slow start, as is often the case with the way in which studios schedule their releases over the course of a calendar year. But the close of 2016 brought some of the decade’s most interesting and compelling movies to the forefront, ones we’ll be talking about for months to come.

    As of the end of 2016, I’ve had the pleasure (and sometimes pain) to enjoy 102 different new release feature films from big-budget studios to smaller independent works that have me starting to believe in the magic of cinema once again. I hope you’ll feel the same way, especially if you see this year’s 10 best films.

    It should be noted that several of the year’s award-contending releases have not been made widely public yet and as such are not in this list, including “Hidden Figures,” “Live By Night,” “Patriots Day” and “Silence.”

    Blockbuster of the year – “Deadpool”

    There may have been more financially successful big-budget popcorn movies to hit the big screen in 2016, but none are as effortlessly enjoyable and re-watchable as Ryan Reynolds’ comic book passion project “Deadpool.”

    “Deadpool” is the perfect star vehicle for Reynolds, who maximizes his wry wit and charm (applied in the film as snark) within the comic book world’s most wisecracking anti-hero. The passion Reynolds exudes for the character radiates every minute he’s on screen, elevating even the more generic superhero scenes crafted out of a cookie-cutter superhero script.

    The film enters a much more fan-friendly environment for cruder, darker subject matter thanks to the cult hit status of British indie dark comedy “Kick-Ass” and Marvel’s Netflix miniseries – “Daredevil,” “Jessica Jones” and “Luke Cage” – which are considerably more violent than the Avengers’ solo and team-up movies.

    The sheer amount of Easter eggs and random pop culture references – akin to the tone of Marvel’s surprise smash hit “Guardians of the Galaxy” – lends itself to multiple viewings, though the monotone plot line does become tiresome midway through multiple screenings. There’s signs of greatness within “Deadpool,” especially when Reynolds isn’t tied down by CGI metal men or hacky, second rate villains.

    Though not a perfect film, “Deadpool” is the hilarious next evolution in the comic book film genre and immensely worthy of blockbuster of the year status.

    Also considered were “Captain America: Civil War” and “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.” 

    Most disappointing film – “Hail, Caesar!”

    The Coen brothers’ “Hail, Caesar!” is a huge swing and an even bigger miss.

    In the big-budget Hollywood movie about big-budget Hollywood making big-budget Hollywood movies, viewers find Josh Brolin star as Eddie Mannix, a Michael Clayton-esque fixer who keeps the scandals of his top actors out of the press in a vague 1950s Los Angeles. Audiences are propelled alongside Brolin as he ping-pongs from one studio lot to the next, fixing issues with major stars and directors to try and keep a theatrical adaptation of a smash Broadway play, a cowboy western, an aquatic musical, and an Roman epic on par with Spartacus on track.

    Clocking in at well under two hours, “Caesar!” attempts to cram far too much into far too little time, leaving major stars like Scarlett Johansson and Jonah Hill with nothing more than extended cameos as a Esther Williams-type actress trying to hide her illegitimate pregnancy and a studio stooge, respectively. 

    This doesn’t even begin to question the decision to limit the screen time of Ralph Fiennes – perhaps the film’s best actor – who perfectly fits the comedic bill of what the Coens were trying to achieve with the film, their take on Wes Anderson’s fantastic “The Grand Budapest Hotel.”

    Visually, “Caesar!” works in the respect that everything feels vintage Hollywood, from the costuming to the sets and performances within each film. The 50’s vibe is definitely there, but the Coens don’t really seem to have a firm grasp on where they want to go with this movie, dragging viewers all over the place in order to come to a middling conclusion at the end.

    While there’s all the pieces for a fantastic film, nothing really seems to come together in “Hail, Caesar!” From top to bottom, the entire production feels out of sync and in need of major structural repair to a confusing, all over the map script that holds “Caesar!” back from being something better.

    Also considered were “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,” “Inferno,” “Suicide Squad” and “X-Men: Apocalypse.”

    Best documentary – “O.J.: Made In America”

    Some may question the validity of this ESPN-produced documentary that checks in at just shy of eight hours long in total. Ezra Edelman’s five-part feature about the life and times of mercurial running back turned accused murderer O.J. Simpson. But as the Academy has ruled this doc eligible for consideration after the entire film was released theatrically in major metropolitan areas, it also is eligible here.

    And what a film event “O.J.: Made In America” is. This is by far the most thorough and complete documentary I’ve ever seen regardless of running time. The depth of information found in this highly compelling, immensely immersive documentary is unparalleled and came at the exact right time in the pop culture scene in 2016, mirroring the terrific television miniseries “American Crime Story: The People Vs. O.J. Simpson.”

    Also considered were “Amanda Knox,” “Audrie and Daisy” and “Weiner.”

    Breakout performer – Kate McKinnon, “Ghostbusters” and “Office Christmas Party”

    “Saturday Night Live” star Kate McKinnon’s 2016 will probably be remembered most for her hilarious (and spot-on) portrayal of failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton over the course of the fall. While comedy gold, I’m throwing all of this out of consideration when looking at feature film breakout performer and McKinnon still takes the cake.

    More so than any other star this year, McKinnon proved with sidesplitting supporting turns in “Office Christmas Party” and especially “Ghostbusters” that she has the comedic chops to carry a 95-minute feature film in a leading role.

    By far the best part of “Ghostbusters,” McKinnon hammers home every punchline she’s given in the film with ruthless efficiency and proves herself to be a future comedy film star with her performance in much the same way Melissa McCarthy became a breakout following “Bridesmaids.” McKinnon is the single best part about “Ghostbusters” and outshines her more famous co-stars McCarthy and Kristen Wiig at every turn.

    Also considered were Alden Ehrenreich (“Hail, Caesar!” and “Rules Don’t Apply”) and Lily Collins (“Rules Don’t Apply”).

    Best supporting actor – Jeff Bridges, “Hell or High Water”

    By far the easiest choice I’ve had to make this year is in the best supporting actor category, where Jeff Bridges stands dominant over a fine slew of potential nominees for this award.

    In “Hell or High Water,” Bridges is damn near perfect as an aging Texas Ranger looking to put away one last bank robber before riding off into the sunset. 

    Inevitably, Bridges’ performance in “High Water” will be compared to Tommy Lee Jones’ effort in the similar, yet much darker Coen Brothers film “No Country for Old Men.” The parts are different sides of the same coin. Bridges does display a very effective “I’m too old for this” mentality, but it’s couple with an uniquely crude and albeit racist sense of humor that’s unexpectedly brilliant. 

    There’s a great deal of levity in Bridges’ partnership with a younger Native American colleague that tracks quite nicely throughout the film. When looking back on Bridges’ career, “High Water” will ultimately represent one of his best performances in a long, storied filmography.

    Also considered were Mahershala Ali (“Moonlight”), Michael Shannon (“Nocturnal Animals”), Aaron Taylor-Johnson (“Nocturnal Animals”) and Mykelti Williamson (“Fences”).

    Best supporting actress – Viola Davis, “Fences”

    I’m not 100 percent certain that I would consider Davis’ role as Denzel Washington’s proud, yet largely subdued wife Rose in the dynamic character drama “Fences” to be a true supporting performance. Davis is in far too much of “Fences” for that. But as she is campaigning in the supporting category and will likely be the Oscar frontrunner for the year, it works for me as well.

    Her dynamic performance in a subtle, understated manner until a critical turn late in the feature is a testament to her ability to create a complex character in limited screen time. Davis’ work is devastatingly arresting and worth the price of admission alone.

    When it comes to awards season, this is the absolute most confident I am in the accuracy of my pick matching the acclaim from Golden Globe and Academy Award voters. She should win and will do so,

    Also considered were Naomie Harris (“Moonlight”), Helen Mirren (“Eye In The Sky”), Rachel Weisz (“The Light Between Oceans”) and Michelle Williams (“Manchester By The Sea”).

    Best actor – Casey Affleck, “Manchester By The Sea”

    Typically, Best Actor accolades go to showy, in-your-face performances where the actor proves their chops by emotionally yelling at someone in a climatic scene that ends up as the highlight reel for their Oscar nomination video.

    Ironically, this year’s best actor doesn’t yell and scream in anger, frustration or passion despite suffering through the tragic loss of his brother and dealing with the aftermath in a town he doesn’t want to be in.

    Casey Affleck’s performance in Kenneth Lonergan’s “Manchester By The Sea” is quietly arresting and frames the entire film in such a somber, morose way that allows the film to be the most honest, genuine, realistic feature to come out in 2016. Every single scene Affleck is in is carefully thoughtout and composed, giving the performance such depth of character as the uncle turned foster parent who just wants his life back.

    This category is probably the closest call out of all the major acting awards as Denzel Washington’s powerhouse performance in “Fences” is right there with Affleck. It’s only by the thinnest of margins that Affleck’s quiet desperation edges out Washington’s flashy performance.

    Also considered were Andrew Garfield (“Hacksaw Ridge”), Ryan Gosling (“La La Land”), Jake Gyllenhaal (“Nocturnal Animals”) and Denzel Washington (“Fences”).

    Best actress – Emma Stone, “La La Land”

    I saw “La La Land” for the first time the day after Christmas shortly after viewing the holiday classic “Love Actually.” One of that film’s most iconic lines was on my mind when I penned the following tweet after seeing “La La Land.”

    It’s Christmas – and at Christmas you tell the truth – to me, Emma Stone is perfect in @LaLaLand. Damien Chazelle is a master.

    A week later, this sentiment remains truer than ever. “La La Land” is the career-defining performance for a talented, Oscar-nominated actress in need of a star-making role. Stone’s turn as struggling actress/barista Mia in Chazelle’s love letter to classic Hollywood musicals is a breath of fresh air amid the dark, harrowing performances we’ve grown accustomed to seeing from Hollywood’s top actresses.

    The entire film, Stone glides through scene after scene as if on a cloud of air. Her performance is so effortless and light, dancing on a road of eggshells in the most charming of ways. Mia is the quintessential persona of what we imagine falling in love to be like when we’re dreaming about it in our heads and Stone takes every care to make the entire experience feel natural.

    “La La Land” is Stone’s movie through and through. There is no better performance by any actor or actress in 2016. Period.

    Also considered were Amy Adams (“Arrival”), Jessica Chastain (“Miss Sloane”), Natalie Portman (“Jackie”) and Alicia Vikander (“The Light Between Oceans”).

    Best director – Damien Chazelle, “La La Land”

    Damien Chazelle proved with 2014’s “Whiplash” that he has a master’s grasp on matching every note of a film’s score with individual frames of film to create uniquely compelling cinema.

    In the terrific movie musical “La La Land,” Chazelle ups the ante with a picturesque love letter to Los Angeles and an ode to classic Gene Kelly and Fred Astaire-Ginger Rogers style musicals. Elegant and classy in every way, “La La Land” evokes old school Hollywood with new school technology thanks to Chazelle’s keen eye.

    “La La Land” is the perfect vehicle for Chazelle to show just how talented of a young director he is.  The vibrancy he is able to create on screen with dynamic color hues that radiate into the audience frame by frame is perfectly balanced against the terrific score from Justin Hurwitz. Los Angeles comes alive in such a forward, present way that few filmmakers have been able to achieve.

    Also considered were Barry Jenkins (“Moonlight”), Kenneth Lonergan (“Manchester By The Sea”), David Mackenzie (“Hell or High Water”) and Denis Villeneuve (“Arrival”).

    Top 10 films of 2016

    Finishing just shy of the top 10 were (in alphabetical order): “Allied,” “Captain America: Civil War,” “Demolition,” “Eye In The Sky,” “Hacksaw Ridge,” “Jackie,” “Miss Sloane,” “Moana,” “Moonlight” and “O.J.: Made In America.”

    10. “Swiss Army Man” (directed by Daniels, starring Paul Dano and Daniel Radcliffe)

    By far the most inventive and unique film of 2016, the Sundance alumni film known to some as “That Farting Movie” makes my list of the 10 best for the year simply due to the level of complexity and ingenuity that the directing team Daniels were able to bring to life.

    Think about it: A man on the verge of suicide saves his own life by discovering and later befriending a rotting corpse that reanimates in unusual, magnificent ways. This should be the logline of a much worse film than “Swiss Army Man” ends up being.

    Paul Dano runs the emotional gambit in the film as the living Hank, bouncing effortlessly from suicidal to gleeful to lonely and inquisitive and back again like only the most manic of actors could pull off. Daniel Radcliffe is a surprising revelation as the undead Manny. The former Harry Potter brings life to a monotone, flat character that allows viewers to discover Manny in different ways as Radcliffe himself finds them through self-exploration of the character.

    No 2016 film will energize you quite like the experience of watching “Swiss Army Man.”

    9. “The Light Between Oceans” (directed by Derek Cianfrance, starring Alicia Vikander and Michael Fassbender)

    Odds are you probably didn’t see this incredibly underappreciated film from “Blue Valentine” and “The Place Beyond The Pines” director Derek Cianfrance, but viewers who took the time to catch this two-hour romantic drama know just how deeply moving the film is.

    It starts with the casting, which leaves two of the best performers working today – Alicia Vikander and Michael Fassbender – alone on a remote Australian island and gives their magnificent performances time to breathe amid picturesque ocean expanses. Fassbender plays romantic stoicism better than anyone in the game, but somehow Vikander topples his work with a soul-crushing, otherworldly turn as his lover.

    “The Light Between Oceans” maintains constantly entrancing cinema despite a slow pace thanks to the cinematography and acting work, including an award-worthy supporting performance from Rachel Weisz in the film’s second half.

    You probably won’t find this film on another Best of 2016 list and that’s a real shame. Go see this hidden gem of a movie as soon as possible.

    8. “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story” (directed by Gareth Edwards, starring Felicity Jones, Diego Luna and Riz Ahmed)

    The only blockbuster film to make this year’s top 10 list, “Rogue One” doesn’t even qualify as the year’s best blockbuster, a title that went to the gleefully distasteful “Deadpool” earlier.

    Admittedly, there are some script issues and a little bit of recycling from other films in the genre that normally would disqualify “Rogue One” from consideration, but the movie’s soon to be iconic final action sequence is so incredibly well-made that Edwards’ film makes the list on that sequence alone.

    Trying not to be too spoiler-filled in this recap, the sequence ends up being the closest thing to a space heist movie filmed in a World War II epic genre style thanks to Edwards’ visual choices in close combat that put viewers right in the heat of battle and amplify the audience’s ability to understand just how perilous the final mission in “Rogue One” truly is.

    Edwards perfectly captures the terror of the Empire’s massive firepower advantage, especially when cranking the camera angle skyward from the beachhead to reveal enormous AT-ST tanks barreling down on the small Rebel infantry force.

    The final 25 minutes of “Rogue One,” including that nostalgic epilogue at the conclusion of battle, are worth the price of admission alone.

    7. “Sing Street” (directed by John Carney, starring Ferdia Walsh-Peelo, Jack Reynor and Lucy Boynton)

    There’s another film in this genre higher on the Best of 2016 list, but without question the best musical of the year is John Carney’s ode to 80s rock music, “Sing Street.”

    “Sing Street” is a more than competent coming of age love story about a young Irish boy forced to attend a new Catholic school for boys in Dublin, who falls in love with the teenage model across the street. What makes Carney’s film remarkable, however, is the pitch perfect use of music to transform the narrative into something much more beautiful.

    In the film, Conor woos Raphina by promising to cast her in a music video for his rock band, except Conor doesn’t have a band. The film is as much about Sing Street finding its sound musically and visually through some incredibly inspired music videos the band makes along the way. It’s a comedy, a drama, a coming of age tale and one of the smartest independent, foreign features to come along in several years.

    One of three movies in 2016 that made me instantly purchase the soundtrack, “Sing Street” is a can’t miss film.

    6. “Nocturnal Animals” (directed by Tom Ford, starring Amy Adams, Jake Gyllenhaal, Michael Shannon and Aaron Taylor-Johnson)

    Few films insist on audiences being present from the opening frame quite like Tom Ford’s dazzling and captivating second feature “Nocturnal Animals,” which begins with the controversial title credits sequence featuring obese, older women dancing naked on screen for three minutes. It’s a defining opening statement to a film that features one of the year’s best ensemble casts and engagingly puzzling screenplays.

    “Nocturnal Animals” leans on the strong performances from its core actors, with Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Shannon doing equally outstanding work in the film’s Texas noir-thriller segments. A full feature simply about this story-within-a-story could have made the top 10 on its own, but the layering of multiple story universes and timelines within “Nocturnal Animals” makes the film one of the most complex, thought-provoking cinematic experiences in several years.

    Ford’s fashion eye carries over well when it comes to the picturesque cinematography, which often feels ripped straight out of a Dior perfume commercial or Vogue magazine advertisement.

    “Nocturnal Animals” is without doubt a film that could have easily been slotted two or three slots higher given additional consideration as the quality really jumps to the next level for the six best movies of 2016.

    5. “Arrival” (directed by Denis Villeneuve, starring Amy Adams and Jeremy Renner)

    Science fiction as a genre hasn’t been strikingly beautiful in more than a decade, but Denis Villeneuve’s arresting, slow-burning think piece about communication and interpersonal relationships set to the tune of an alien invasion movie is the perfect remedy.

    “Arrival” confirms Villeneuve as one of the top three to five directors working in Hollywood today His film is the perfect thinking man’s sci-fi drama as Villeneuve and crew engage audiences in spirited debate about the meaning of language, reacting out of fear and using communication as a tool to bring people together rather than one to tear people apart. Cinematographer Bradford Young’s gorgeous work shooting the film elevates the entire piece to another level entirely.

    For all its visual wizardry and narrative complexity, “Arrival” lives and dies by the success or failure of Adams’ lead performance as Louise Banks, who drives the entirety of the action from start to finish. Fortunately for moviegoers, Adams hits it out of the park. While other actresses might have played Banks on a more one-dimensional level to let the technical aspects shine, Adams elevates her performance to the same level with a thoroughly layered, nuanced turn.

    What viewers will likely remember first when looking back on “Arrival” are the beautifully grotesque aliens that Banks and Donnelly encounter, known in the film simply as heptapods. While describing the heptapods at great length would ruin the surprise of their initial appearance, Villeneuve and his creative team do a masterful job of making such a strange, unappealing creature look stunning nevertheless. The visual artistry displayed in “Arrival” when it comes to these alien lifeforms is worth the price of admission alone.

    4. “Fences” (directed by Denzel Washington, starring Washington and Viola Davis)

    August Wilson’s Pulitzer Prize and Tony Award winning play about an aging former Negro League baseball player does not seem at first glance like it would be prime cinema fodder. Not until you get Denzel Washington’s hands on the material.

    First on stage in the 2010 Broadway revival and later in the 2016 film he directs, Washington and co-star Viola Davis put on an acting clinic for nearly two-and-a-half hours few films this decade could match. “Fences” feels like the audience is sitting on stage with the performers and it’s nearly flawless as a slice-of-life film reflecting on middle class African-American life in the 1950s.

    Scenes are extended in small, tight locales in Troy’s backyard, kitchen or porch for 15-20 minutes at a time without much room for audiences to breathe. The confining nature of the filmmaking along with Charlotte Bruus Christensen’s subdued cinematography make for a unique experience unlike anything you’ll see in theaters this year.

    Davis will win the Best Supporting Actress Oscar and Washington could easily overtake the star of the third best film of 2016 for the Best Actor prize as well. Dramatic acting doesn’t get much better than “Fences.”

    3. “Manchester By The Sea” (directed by Kenneth Lonergan, starring Casey Affleck, Lucas Hedges, Kyle Chandler and Michelle Williams)

    As character driven family dramas go, you’ll be hard pressed to find one more gut-wrenching and emotional as Kenneth Lonergan’s heartfelt “Manchester By The Sea,” a film so powerful that it’s difficult to put down in words the impact this film has on a scene to scene basis.

    Casey Affleck’s masterful turn as a Boston janitor looking to live a simple life when his brother’s sudden death puts him in charge of his teenage nephew is the best work of Affleck’s career. Supporting performances from Lucas Hedges, Kyle Chandler and Gretchen Mol combined with an Oscar-worthy supporting effort from Michelle Williams makes “Manchester By The Sea” the best ensemble film of 2016.

    There’s just enough humor throughout the relationship drama to offset the immense pain felt by the characters throughout the film and it brings much needed levity to keep viewers engaged throughout.

    A simple, yet effective film, “Manchester By The Sea” features some of the year’s best filmmaking from top to bottom and could easily be the top film of the year on many a critic’s list.

    2. “La La Land” (directed by Damien Chazelle, starring Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone)

    There’s not really a more delightful cinematic experience in 2016 than “La La Land,” Damien Chazelle’s vibrant, romantic love letter to classic Hollywood musicals and the dreams a city like Los Angeles can make come true.

    Visually perfect with the best musical score of the year, “La La Land” features a terrific performance from the elegantly understated Ryan Gosling and the career-best work of Emma Stone in an engaging, mesmerizing cinematic wanderlust through the beautiful Los Angeles skyline and iconic landmarks.

    This modern take on vintage Hollywood storytelling leaps off the screen and pulls viewers in for a classy, adventurous ride about struggling artists falling in love in Los Angeles. It’s exactly the kind of film that might have starred Gene Kelly or Bing Crosby decades ago and yet feels so incredibly fresh and authentic in a modern, 21st century way.

    While the primary hook for “La La Land” is inevitably its musical genre, the film shines brightest as a straight character-driven drama with outstanding performances from leads Gosling and Stone. Now in their third film together, Gosling and Stone’s pitch perfect chemistry drive the entirety of the action and make viewers want to dream and fall in love all over again.

    1. “Hell Or High Water” (directed by David Mackenzie, starring Chris Pine, Ben Foster and Jeff Bridges)

    I called this back in August. The opening of my initial review of this film still stands as true today as it did four months ago:

    “Hell or High Water” is the best film you’ll see this year.

    This isn’t hyperbole or a statement made lightly, especially given the fact that there’s still four months and an entire season of Academy Award candidates yet to be released.

    Beautifully crafted and acted, the first major release film from director David Mackenzie stars Chris Pine and Ben Foster as brothers who resort to robbing banks in sleepy West Texas towns while being pursued by a grizzled veteran Texas Ranger played by Jeff Bridges.

    “Hell or High Water” is a funky combination of thriller and neo-Western ripped straight out of a different era. Were they alive today, “High Water” is a movie that Steve McQueen and/or James Dean might star in – a quintessential tale of antiheros running from the law for morally just reasons. “Hell or High Water” is “The Getaway” with a conscience; a western “Rebel Without A Cause.”

    There aren’t any flaws that I can find with “Hell or High Water.” It’s the closest thing to the perfect cinematic experience I’ve found in quite some time.

    The acting is tremendous. Chris Pine does the best work of his career, Ben Foster is peaking at the right time with this movie and Jeff Bridges should unquestionably win the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for this film. Bridges in “Hell or High Water” may be one of the two or three best performances in his entire career. It’s that good.

    “Hell or High Water” isn’t a western in the same John Wayne, Clint Eastwood way of thinking about westerns, but it is without a doubt an evolution of the genre to something more complex and layered.

    It’s the best movie of the year.

  • Fences: It’s all about the acting

    Fences: It’s all about the acting

    Broadway doesn’t usually translate to the silver screen all that well.

    Oscar winner Denzel Washington’s film adaptation of August Wilson’s Pulitzer Prize and Tony Award winning play “Fences” might just be the truest, most authentic stage to screen transformation in cinematic history.

    “Fences” might not be the year’s best movie, nor a game changer in Hollywood for years to come. However for nearly two-and-a-half hours, Washington and co-star Viola Davis put on an acting clinic few films this decade could match.

    And at the end of the day, that’s really all there is to “Fences,” a movie that feels like the audience is sitting on stage with the performers, most of whom are reprising their roles from a 2010 revival on the Great White Way.


    Washington plays Troy, a former Negro League baseball star living in a small Pittsburgh house now forced to work as a garbage collector at 53. A character-driven drama focused on Troy, his wife Rose (Davis) and their teenage son Cory (Jovan Adepo), “Fences” is the perfect slice-of-life film reflecting on middle class African-American life in the 1950s and unfolds more like a stage drama than a cinematic one.

    Scenes are extended in small, tight locales in Troy’s backyard, kitchen or porch for 15-20 minutes at a time without much room for audiences to breathe. The confining nature of the filmmaking along with Charlotte Bruus Christensen’s subdued cinematography make for a unique experience unlike anything you’ll see in theaters this year.

    While his work as director on the project is quite good, “Fences” may go down as one of the five best films Washington has ever done for his masterful portrayal of Troy, a performance he’s clearly thought about and crafted over nearly a decade. 

    Few performances you will see in 2016 will have anywhere close to the charisma and vibrancy Washington exudes out of Troy early in the film. When the entire narrative flips on a dime just prior to the start of the third act, Washington completely reverses course and digs within himself for an incredibly poignant, powerful turn that will leave viewers astonished at the end.

    Normally, a tour-de-force turn from two-time Academy Award winner Washington would chew up all the scenery and be the entire focal point of the feature.

    Previously an Academy Award nominee for “Doubt” and “The Help,” Davis will be this year’s clear frontrunner for Best Supporting Actress in a career best performance as Rose. Her ability to play off Washington’s dynamic performance in a subtle, understated manner until a critical turn late in the feature is a testament to her ability to create a complex character in limited screen time. Davis’ work is devastatingly arresting and worth the price of admission alone.

    “Fences” is also buoyed by a terrific supporting cast, many of whom also reprise their roles from the 2010 Broadway revival. Mykelti Williamson is an absolute revelation as Troy’s brother Gabriel, a war veteran severely injured in battle causing him to become mentally handicapped. There’s both an immense joy and sadness within Williamson’s performance that should be celebrated during awards season, but likely won’t do to higher profile, more flashy turns from other performers.

    Even without the expected reaction to last year’s #OscarsSoWhite controversy pushing voters towards African-American led films, “Fences” should be a shoo in for nominations in the Best Picture, Best Actor and Best Supporting Actress categories. An additional nomination for Washington in the Best Director category would not be out of the realm of possibility either.

    Simply put, “Fences” is unquestionably one of the year’s 10 best films and the closest thing to live theater that cinema can bring to the big screen.

    Washington’s third directorial effort is an amazing foot forward into the possibilities of adapting Broadway plays and a must see for any Academy Award lover this holiday season.

  • Nocturnal Animals: Creatures of the night

    Nocturnal Animals: Creatures of the night

    Chances are there will never be another movie quite like “Nocturnal Animals.”

    Fashion designer turned director Tom Ford’s second film makes bold statement after bold statement cinematically on its way to being one of the year’s best movies – and certainly its most controversial.

    Before any of the feature’s four main stars – Amy Adams, Jake Gyllenhaal, Michael Shannon or Aaron Taylor-Johnson – even hit the screen, Ford sets the stage with a bizarre, jarring opening credit sequence featuring several aging, obese women dancing naked for three-and-a-half minutes.

    Even after it’s revealed that the women are part of an exhibition showcase for a high-end art gallery run by Susan Morrow (Adams), the sequence still seems so out of place within the context of the rest of the film and may drive some viewers to leave the theater. This would be a mistake as “Nocturnal Animals” is one of the year’s most compelling dramas with a highly complex plot and masterful individual performances.

    The film focuses on three different timelines: Susan’s present day life interrupted by a package from her ex-husband Edward, her romance and marriage to Edward and the content of the novel Edward sends Susan to read after not speaking to her for nearly 20 years. Additional details would ruin Ford’s terrific adaptation of the 1993 novel “Tony and Susan” by Austin Wright.


    One of the best actors working today, Gyllenhaal does masterful work pulling double duty as both Susan’s ex Edward and the male protagonist in Edward’s novel, Tony. Gyllenhaal finely crafts a delicate balance between making each of his characters unique and blurring the lines between the two as the story progresses. No actor exhibits internal or external emotional turmoil better than Gyllenhaal and he is able to put both on display in a perfect effort.

    Adams is constrained by the plot to offset Gyllenhaal with a subdued, internal performance that bridges timeline gaps. As a result, her work is not as showy, but rather Adams portrays Susan as a woman with suffocated elegance struggling to find herself. There are a lot of small, nuanced facial tics that Adams develops to help layer the character and mirror Gyllenhaal’s two roles that are more readily apparent on a second viewing.

    Veteran character actor Shannon has yet to be nominated for an Academy Award, which might soon be corrected with a much deserved honor for his work as a west Texas cop leading a missing persons investigation in Edward’s novel. The consistently fantastic actor delivers as chain-smoking detective Bobby Andes with a measured, scene stealing performance rivaling leading Oscar contender Jeff Bridges’ turn in a similar role in “Hell or High Water.”

    Taylor-Johnson, best known for his work in superhero films like “Kick-Ass” and “Avengers: Age of Ultron,” turns in a career best performance as Ray, a nefarious drifter that serves as the primary antagonist in Edward’s novel. Ray borders on criminally incompetent or ingenious depending on the given moment and the effort is one of those unexpected gems that elevates the entire film to the next level.

    Ford’s fashion eye carries over well when it comes to the picturesque cinematography of “Nocturnal Animals,” which often feels like it was ripped straight out of a Dior perfume commercial or Vogue magazine advertisement. Director of photography Seamus McGarvey does a tremendous job of making rich Los Angeles and western desert landscapes come to life as Ford allows “Nocturnal Animals” plenty of time to breathe scene to scene.

    There’s a lot of merit – both acting and technical – that should be under consideration this awards season, though it’s quite possible that the film’s controversial open could keep “Nocturnal Animals” out of the running in many major categories. 

    An award nomination for Adams’ performance in the mesmerizing sci-fi drama “Arrival” could easily be construed as a joint nomination with her effort here. Similarly, Gyllenhaal deserves strong consideration for his two-pronged effort in “Nocturnal Animals” coupled with a highly underrated turn as a grieving widower in “Demolition” but this seems like more of a long shot.

    Moviegoers willing to allow themselves not to be swayed by the film’s shocking open will find “Nocturnal Animals” a scintillating and provocative psychological thriller than captivates audiences from start to finish.

    Led by a terrific ensemble cast and gorgeous cinematography, “Nocturnal Animals” will end up among the year’s five best films and is an absolute must see in theaters. 

  • Allied: The spy who loved he

    Allied: The spy who loved he

    Love isn’t easy for the average Joe.
    It mus be massively complicated for spies living on the edge during the heyday of World War II Europe, or at least Robert Zemeckis is banking on audiences believing it.

    His latest film, “Allied,” stars Brad Pitt and Marion Cotillard as veteran assassins who fall in love during their first mission together killing a German ambassador. After the war, Max and Marianne wed and start a family in Britain only to have their entire relationship called into question when Max’s superior receive intelligence that Marianne covertly works as a German agent.


    For the most part, “Allied” is a genre-bending thriller that meanders into a variety of cinematic styles whenever the script from Steven Knight asks for it. The film starts as a “Casablanca”-esque drama that escalates into full scale action thriller before settling into tense seat-clenching spy tradecraft mystery you’d find in a John le Carre novel. 

    Pitt is his usual award-worthy self as Max, the loyal soldier conflicted between love and country. His performance is more stoic than might have been expected given the plot devices, but Pitt plays it off with class. “Allied” will likely be another one of those films where Pitt doesn’t get nearly the credit he deserves as an actor because of his ridiculously good looks, but another actor in the same role doesn’t give half of the performance Pitt does.

    He’s well served, though, playing opposite the alluring and mysterious Cotillard, whose Marianne sits firmly on the border between lover and betrayer to keep the audience guessing all the way until the final frames. It’s a nearly flawless performance for Cotillard, whose best film work comes in the femme fatale role.

    “Allied” is also aided by several terrific supporting cast members including veteran character actor Jared Harris as Max’s friend and superior officer Frank and a cameo from British actor Matthew Goode as an ailing British officer hiding vital information to Max’s quest.

    Where “Allied” suffers most is in its opening 20 minutes, which relies much too heavily on slow moving expanse shots of Casablanca in what has to be a homage to the iconic film about the West African city. Chopping the prologue in half would help keep viewers engaged early in “Allied,” which is necessary for audiences to become invested in the outcome of the lead characters.

    Moviegoers planning on seeing the spy drama should not be discouraged by the tepid pace set by editors Mick Audsley and Jeremiah O’Driscoll. “Allied” outlasts this relatively minor flaw to become a solid, worthwhile espionage thriller.

    Zemeckis takes painstaking care to ensure his film is one of the most picturesque of the year, often lingering on Don Burgess’s masterfully composed shots far longer than the average director would. Pacing issues aside, “Allied” is a well crafted, meticulous effort by Zemeckis, who draws the most out of a stellar lead cast to develop the year’s most nuanced film outside of Denis Villeneuve’s sci-fi drama “Arrival.”

    “Allied” probably won’t receive the same sort of Academy Award nominations and critical accolades last year’s historical espionage drama “Bridge of Spies” received. Whether it’s the lack of a name director like Steven Spielberg or the tabloid publicity generated by Pitt’s divorce, “Allied” won’t have the broad appeal among voters. 

    It’s a shame, however, as Cotillard offers a performance that should be worthy of a Best Actress nomination and Pitt’s lack of a Oscar win feels downright criminal at this point of his exemplary career.

    “Allied” does a terrific job melding historical drama and spy thriller to create an often engaging period film in spite of the film’s slow start. 

    Until the Oscar contenders start hitting the theaters at the end of December, “Allied” will likely be the best adult drama available and a must see for those wanting to head to the movies before “Rogue One” opens Dec. 16.

  • Rules Don’t Apply: Beatty leads Howard Hughes fiction

    Rules Don’t Apply: Beatty leads Howard Hughes fiction

    Nostalgia is a pretty powerful thing in modern moviemaking.

    More than ever, films try to remind us about the good old days of cinema, whether it’s CGI sharks terrorizing Blake Lively in the “Jaws” homage “The Shallows” or any one of a dozen Disney live-action remakes of classic cartoon movies or even “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” which turns into a carbon copy of “Star Wars: A New Hope.”

    Writer/director/star Warren Beatty attempts to remind us of another style of classic cinema, Marilyn Monroe-era dramedy, with his new film “Rules Don’t Apply.” 

    Beatty crams himself right in the heart of the film, playing aging billionaire Howard Hughes as he mingles with naïve starlets looking for a shot on the big screen in one of his pictures and navigates business deals while suffering from depression and paranoia. Much of viewers’ understanding of Hughes is seen through the eyes of Frank Forbes (Alden Ehrenreich), a businessman hoping to get in the door with Hughes by serving as a driver for one of the 12-20 starlets in Hughes’ employ. Romance plays a part in “Rules Don’t Apply” with Marla Mabrey (Lily Collins), a devout Baptist torn between her beliefs, attraction to Forbes and loyalty to a benefactor she’s never met.

    What plays out on screen is a largely entertaining, often puzzling dramedy that doesn’t have the impact that Beatty might like or that a character like Howard Hughes ultimately deserves. It can’t help that Martin Scorcese’s Oscar winning drama “The Aviator” set the bar on Hughes films ridiculously high, but even by lesser standards, “Rules Don’t Apply” is middling fare and more on par with the Coen Brothers’ average Hollywood comedy “Hail, Caesar” from earlier this year.

    Beatty’s turn as Hughes is quirky and eccentric, like one might expect Hughes to be, but Beatty finds slight moments of cognitive thinking and understanding to show there’s still some part of the successful businessman hiding under the surface. There’s definitely homage to Tom Wilkinson’s brand of crazy businessman from the vastly superior “Michael Clayton,” but Beatty holds his own enough to dominate any scene he’s in to the film’s credit or detriment depending on the moment.

    Ehrenreich continues to pad his acting resume with a solid, unspectacular performance as Forbes though he occasionally shows enough of his star caliber to remind viewers why he’s in line to play a young Han Solo in the next “Star Wars” spinoff film slated for 2018. “Rules Don’t Apply” puts audiences in Frank’s shoes for much of the way in order to immerse ourselves in the world around Frank. As a result, Ehrenreich mostly tries to get out of his own way and remain just present enough in scenes to keep the action moving while not hitting any major marks of his own.

    The true star of “Rules Don’t Apply” is Collins, who will hopefully receive more dramatic opportunities outside the young adult film genre to sparkle. Her ability to play smart and naïve simultaneously in both romantic and non-romantic settings within the film is remarkable and Collins more than holds her own in scenes opposite Beatty, who does everything he possibly can to upstage her. This feels like a career-defining role for Collins if enough commercial and critical support can boost her up to the next level.

    “Rules Don’t Apply” also benefits from a deep and talented supporting cast in a variety of extended cameo roles, whether it be Alec Baldwin as an executive for Hughes’s company, Annette Bening as Mabrey’s prim and proper mother or Martin Sheen as the oustered CEO of the Hughes empire. Matthew Broderick does yeoman’s work as the more experienced driver mentoring Forbes through the business and Candice Bergen is solid opposite Collins and Beatty as Hughes’ personal secretary.

    Ultimately, Beatty’s first major film project in more than 15 years is a welcome return to the screen, though “Rules Don’t Apply” can’t totally hold together over the two hour stretch.  Talk of Academy Award consideration for Beatty as Hughes feels more like a legacy nomination than for actual merit.

    For Beatty fans, “Rules Don’t Apply” is worth a look whether it be at the theaters or in its inevitable run on basic cable.

  • Arrival: Can you hear me now?

    Arrival: Can you hear me now?

    There’s something beautifully simple about the complexity of “Arrival,” Denis Villeneuve’s captivatingly science fiction drama.
    While the film’s premise feels cookie-cutter cliché, “Arrival” asks more rhetorical questions than it ultimately answers and should serve as a conversation starter about understanding instead of fearing our allies, enemies and the unknown in trying political and social times.

    Villeneuve’s third major feature film is the perfect counterbalance to the more popcorn “Star Trek” and “Star Wars” of the cinematic lexicon and redefines artistic science fiction filmmaking in a clearer way than Christopher Nolan’s star-studded “Interstellar.”

    Amy Adams stars as Dr. Louise Banks, a linguistics professor brought in by the United States military to interpret and communicate with an alien race after large oval-shaped UFOs land in 12 hotspots throughout the globe. Paired with theoretical physicist Ian Donnelly (Jeremy Renner), Banks has to provide the foundation for interspecies communication under the pressures of global politics all while grieving over the loss of her daughter Hannah.

    ​http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tFMo3UJ4B4g

    For all its visual wizardry and narrative complexity, “Arrival” lives and dies by the success or failure of Adams’ lead performance as Banks, who drives the entirety of the action from start to finish. Fortunately for moviegoers, Adams hits it out of the park with her best performance since 2010’s “The Fighter.” Her Banks is logical, yet deeply emotional both from the death of her daughter and the harrowing position the military puts her in. While other actresses might have played Banks on a more one-dimensional level to let the technical aspects shine, Adams elevates her performance to the same level with a thoroughly layered, nuanced turn that will likely be on award voters’ minds as a part of her expected nominated for the yet-to-be-released “Nocturnal Animals” later this month.

    The always solid Renner does a terrific job in a supporting role as Donnelly, balancing a fine line between challenging and supporting Banks throughout her mission. A slight character adjustment one way or another would have made Donnelly a pushover or a bully, but Renner keeps Donnelly right in the sweet spot in between to advance the film forward and accentuate Adams’ terrific performance.

    What viewers will likely remember first when looking back on “Arrival” are the beautifully grotesque aliens that Banks and Donnelly encounter, known in the film simply as heptapods. While describing the heptapods at great length would ruin the surprise of their initial appearance, Villeneuve and his creative team do a masterful job of making such a strange, unappealing creature look stunning nevertheless. The visual artistry displayed in “Arrival” when it comes to these alien lifeforms is worth the price of admission alone.

     “Arrival” confirms Villeneuve as one of the top three to five directors working in Hollywood today following the critical success of the kidnapping drama “Prisoners” and the Oscar-nominated thriller “Sicario.” His film is the perfect thinking man’s sci-fi drama as Villeneuve and crew engage audiences in spirited debate about the meaning of language, reacting out of fear and using communication as a tool to bring people together rather than one to tear people apart.

    The film is a surprisingly poignant think piece that forces moviegoers to question their own interactions and sense of right and wrong on interpersonal and geopolitical levels. The intellectual depth that “Arrival” richly bathes in makes it a prime candidate for multiple screenings in the theaters to better understand the complexities of the film’s underlying themes.

    Cinematographer Bradford Young masterfully crafts each shot with piercing technical skill to reflect the mood and tone of every scene. The visuals developed over the course of the film become key to the movie watching experience as Villeneuve and Young separate the audience from the narrative in a cold, clinical way. It’s as if moviegoers are watching events unfold like tourists visiting a large aquarium or, in a sense, become the scientists engaging with the heptapods through a clear wall as shown in the film.

    It’s unlikely that Villeneuve will see the same sort of awards season success that “Sicario” did sneaking into the Oscar race last year, though a nomination in the technical categories for Young’s cinematography isn’t entirely out of the question given the expected backlash from 2016’s #OscarsSoWhite movement. Regardless, “Arrival” is a film that stays with viewers long after they leave the theater and will likely end up as one of the five best movies in 2016.

     “Arrival” isn’t the alien encounter film anyone has been asking for. It’s the one smart moviegoers deserve. Don’t make the mistake of passing it up.

  • Hacksaw Ridge: What it means to serve

    Hacksaw Ridge: What it means to serve

    Unwavering heroism amidst the ravages of war is explored in Mel Gibson’s latest directorial effort “Hacksaw Ridge,” sure to be one of the year’s ten best feature films.

    Gibson expertly combines gruesome World War II era violence akin to Steven Spielberg’s classic “Saving Private Ryan” with dramatic underpinnings of faith, family and love for your fellow man that one might expect in a traditional faith-based movie.

    “Hacksaw Ridge” tells the true story of Desmond Doss, a Seventh Day Adventist who volunteers to serve in the Pacific during World War II despite being a conscientious objector who refuses to carry a weapon into battle. Doss overcame court-martial to serve his country at the Hacksaw Ridge offensive during the Battle of Okinawa, rescuing 75 men as a combat medic largely behind enemy lines.


    Andrew Garfield shines as Doss, a man imbued with unshakeable conviction for both his country and his nonviolent beliefs. “Hacksaw Ridge” is unquestionably the best work of Garfield’s career and, along with a stellar turn in last year’s “99 Homes,” marks a turning point past two films in the “Spiderman” franchise. While it could be easily said that “Hacksaw Ridge” is an incredible war film, Garfield’s expert portrayal of a man who refuses to fight but demands to serve elevates the performances of every actor around him and the movie as a whole.

    Hugo Weaving, who has largely slept-walked his way through films since his breakout as Agent Smith in “The Matrix” trilogy, comes alive opposite Garfield as Doss’s alcoholic, belligerent father racked with emotional guilt after being the only of his friends to survive two tours of duty during World War I. Many war films attempt to gloss over the home life of the soldiers they feature, but Gibson embraces the task head-on in limited, but well-acted scenes between Weaving and Garfield. Both actors perform flawlessly in developing the character of the man Doss was by hammering home how he came to be that man.

    Less successful in this respect is the film’s romantic interludes as Doss courts a local nurse named Dorothy (Teresa Palmer) who later becomes his wife. At first glance, it’s unclear whether the romance angle of “Hacksaw Ridge” falters due to script issues or Palmer’s bland, ineffective performance, but the on-screen couple have very little chemistry.

    Doss’s military superiors as played by “Avatar” star Sam Worthington and funnyman Vince Vaughn are unusual casting choices, but neither actor gets in the way of the overall film.

    “Hacksaw Ridge” is perhaps the most graphically violent World War II era war film since “Saving Private Ryan,” but Gibson relies on the authenticity of the conflict to drive home just how harrowing Doss’s story of heroism and survival genuinely was. With the lead character serving as a medic, it shouldn’t come as much surprise that the level of gore within “Hacksaw Ridge” is amplified by the length of time bodies with severed limbs are shown on screen. 

    Embracing violence has been a trademark of his films dating back to 1995’s “Braveheart,” but Gibson does a terrific job of approaching the ravages of war from a fresh perspective and is buoyed by Garfield’s strong individual effort. “Hacksaw Ridge” will likely stay in the Oscar conversation, but ultimately fall short due to the graphic violence and controversial nature of the film’s director. It would not be a surprise, however, to see Garfield’s work in the film honored as part of a nomination for his role in Martin Scorcese’s “Silence.”

    Doss’s tale of patriotic heroism is too important for mature audiences not to make an effort to see “Hacksaw Ridge” at least once and Gibson’s film will probably never look better than it does on the big screen. Even though it arrives in a highly charged political climate, the film opts to avoid definitely becoming a pro-war or anti-war piece and benefits greatly from its relative evenhandedness.

    While not a perfect film, “Hacksaw Ridge” will ultimately be remembered as one of Hollywood’s best World War II efforts and a must see for those capable of handling its brutality.

  • Florence Foster Jenkins: Loving the un-pretty voices

    Florence Foster Jenkins: Loving the un-pretty voices

    Award season doesn’t hit for another several months, with major contenders typically not hitting theaters until mid-December.

    There’s usually one exception to this rule annually and in 2016, it comes in the form of Meryl Streep, an actress so synonymous with Academy Award nominations that her mere involvement in a feature vaults it to the top of prognosticators’ lists.

    Her latest film, the comedic biopic “Florence Foster Jenkins,” certainly doesn’t disappoint in any regard. 


    After finding critical and moderate commercial success in early August, Streep’s latest film returned to new theaters last week and wowed audiences with its rarely successful combination of humor and poignancy.

    In the film, Streep stars as Jenkins, a World War II-era socialite who utilizes her family fortune to sponsor classical music concerts across New York City. Eager to make it herself as an opera star, she enlists the talents of her actor/manager husband St Clair (Hugh Grant), pianist Cosme (Simon Helberg) and an assistant conductor for the Metropolitan Opera to coach her despite the fact that she is unaware how incapable she is of singing well.

    Films like “Florence Foster Jenkins” aren’t worth making without a generational talent like Streep and she proves it once again in the film’s titular role. At first glance, there’s a lot of Streep’s Oscar nominated turn as Julia Child in “Julie and Julia” within her Florence. But Streep imbues Florence with significantly more depth than it might appear and certainly more than “the world’s worst famous singer” moniker might imply.

    While it’s obvious to point out how difficult it is to intentionally sing poorly (and Streep does so masterfully), the true brilliance within her performance is how effortlessly Streep layers Florence’s public and private personas. As a character, Florence naturally interacts differently with all the men in her life, but does so in a much more authentic way than one might expect from a traditional biopic. Streep does a wonderful job of invigorating each of her characters with such extreme individuality. 

    Grant’s charming, yet duplicitous turn as Florence’s husband St Clair could very well earn the veteran actor his long overdue first Academy Award nomination. Grant makes St Clair charming and out for himself just enough to justify his secret affair while simultaneously demonstrating his character’s immense and enduring love for Florence.

    “Big Bang Theory” star Helberg surprises not only with his refreshingly touching and humorous role as pianist Cosme McMoon, but with his actual musical talent. A well versed musician in his own right, Helberg plays all of the music within “Florence Foster Jenkins” himself. It’s a unique talent that helped land the TV funnyman his first big movie in a critical supporting role opposite Streep. 

    What make Helberg perfect for “Florence Foster Jenkins,” however, is his pitch perfect comic timing in both the verbal and non-verbal sense, matching exactly the audience’s genuine reaction to Florence’s musical idiosyncrasies. Viewers are best able to emotionally connect with the film’s poignant third act by growing to love Florence as Cosme does. Helberg’s terrific performance elevates the entire film beyond being simply “a Meryl Streep movie.” 

    “Florence Foster Jenkins” isn’t remotely close to director Stephen Frears’ best work, with 2006’s “The Queen” and 2013’s “Philomena” both being better written, more technically savvy works. But Frears knows enough to get out of his own way and let his stars’ performances shine.

    In all likelihood, “Florence Foster Jenkins” will only be in contention for accolades in acting categories despite being one of the year’s most singularly delightful offerings. Streep’s name alone could garner her 20th Academy Award nomination for a deserving performance while a charming Grant could slip into best supporting actor contention depending on how other films shake out in December.

    Though the humor is dry, “Florence Foster Jenkins” is anything but a bore and should be a must see for movie fans looking for the film’s second theatrical run or as a rental at the end of the year.

  • The Birth Of A Nation: Personal conflict

    The Birth Of A Nation: Personal conflict

    ​Note: This is not a review of the 2016 Sundance award winning film, The Birth Of A Nation. This is a personal narrative about my struggles deciding if I should watch the Nate Parker film at all after news of rape charges in 1999. I don’t know that I’ll ever be able to bring myself to put pen to paper and write a full review of the film. I won’t write a single word of that review that references the controversy surrounding Parker. I only want to review the art, not the artist.

    It’s been nearly a week since I drove an hour away to see The Birth Of A Nation.

    It was incredibly difficult for me to put my thoughts into words then while hammering away a few notes on my cell phone.

    It’s incredibly difficult for me to write about this film now. And it shouldn’t have had to be.

    Ever since Nate Parker’s Civil War-era biopic blew viewers away at Sundance winning both the audience award and jury prize, The Birth Of A Nation had been on the top of my must see list for nearly a year. Early reviews were glowing; 23 of the 24 critic reviews on Rotten Tomatoes were positive and verging on gushing over this film, which seemed to be the cure-all for the #OscarsSoWhite controversy that roared throughout Hollywood in early 2016.

    The Birth Of A Nation was an important movie then. And it’s still an important movie now, but for so many other reasons.

    I wish I could have experienced The Birth Of A Nation then, when Parker’s determination to give up his career and finances to make his passion project was the film’s primary narrative; when the cinema mattered more than the man who made it.

    I’ll never get to experience that Birth Of A Nation.

    My Birth Of A Nation experience is/was/will forever be shrouded in the fog of the August revelation that Parker had been charged with raping a fellow undergrad while on the wrestling team at Penn State University in 1999. He was later acquitted of those charges, but his friend and Birth Of A Nation co-writer Jean Celestin was found guilty and sentenced to six months in prison.

    Everything changed.

    The Oscar buzz dried up. Critics couldn’t write reviews without referencing controversy. Promotional efforts shrank. Wanting to see the film felt like a stain you couldn’t wash out.

    Personally, I hadn’t considered skipping The Birth Of A Nation until an independent filmmaker I truly respected posted on Facebook that he felt legitimately conflicted about seeing the movie after the Parker controversy was made public.

    Was there something that I was missing?

    Having zero experience with sexual assault (or sex at all for that matter) and nearly no knowledge of rape culture, I did what I would do with any topic: read as many articles as I could and watched the most respected documentaries on the topic I could find.

    A couple weeks before the Parker controversy came to light, I had seen ESPN’s terrific and powerful “30 for 30” documentary Fantastic Lies about the Duke lacrosse team scandal where three players were accused of the gang rape of a stripper they hired for a team party. Those allegations had later been proven false.

    When I first read about Parker’s rape charges and acquittal, instantly the Duke case came to mind. I think I wanted the rape to be untrue, even though I’ve since learned that a small percentage of rape allegations actually are. Instantly, I knew The Birth Of A Nation was poisoned beyond repair and I was sad. I wanted to see this up-and-coming filmmaker’s work in the light it was made to be seen it. Now that was impossible.

    I’ll never know for certain whether the rape happened. And that’s immensely frustrating. Definitive proof one way or another would have selfishly made my decision whether or not to see the film easier, or at least easier to justify.

    Something still felt wrong.

    Was I perpetuating rape culture by wanting to see this film, by wanting to see this filmmaker vindicated for my own selfish purposes?

    I certainly didn’t want to be.

    I watched The Hunting Ground, Kirby Dick’s emotional and powerful documentary about rape on college campuses as seen through the experiences of victims seeking justice through their universities and finding little to none. It’s a heartbreaking film.

    I still didn’t feel like I understood enough, so I watched it again. And again. And again. Four screenings of The Hunting Ground just made me feel lost and helpless. I wanted to help end the cycle so no woman or man would have to go through the pain and suffering of such an emotionally scarring, devastating event. I didn’t know that I could.

    Was watching The Birth Of A Nation a betrayal of these feelings? To this day, I still don’t know.

    A couple of days before I saw the Sundance Award winning film, I watched another emotionally wrecking and powerful documentary, Audrie and Daisy, on Netflix. The documentary follows the stories of several teenage girls who are victims of sexual assault in their early high school years. Though both Audrie and Daisy are emotionally devastated by their assaults, Audrie commits suicide while Daisy struggles to regain herself before joining fellow teen victims to create a survivors’ organization.

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=29Dr4ChJUBc
    I thought about that film and those young women a lot in the last week and a half. I thought about the Duke lacrosse players whose lives are irreparably changed because of allegations that just weren’t true. I thought about Brock Turner, the Stanford swimmer who sexually assaulted an intoxicated woman behind a dumpster and left her there only to receive three months of actual jail time. I thought about the woman who killed herself in 2012 because she continued to be haunted by the events that occurred between her, Parker and Celestin one night at Penn State in 1999. 

    I continue to wonder “What if that had been me? What if that had been someone I loved?” as I attempt to place myself in the shoes of both accuser and accused in every situation. I still have no answers.

    Those thoughts flooded my mind as I drove 45 miles to see The Birth Of A Nation, all the while questioning whether I should watch something else or just turn around and go home.

    I decided to watch The Birth Of A Nation because for that two-hour window one Saturday morning, I was able to separate Nate Parker the filmmaker from Nate Parker the person.

    I don’t know if I’ll ever watch The Birth Of A Nation again. I don’t know if I can.

  • Snowden: NSA surveillance for dummies

    Snowden: NSA surveillance for dummies

    ​There’s an inevitable desire to start constantly looking over your shoulder and watching what you post on social media after screening the political drama “Snowden,” now in theaters.

    Oscar winner Oliver Stone’s paranoia-inducing image rehabilitation feature narrative on famed former NSA analyst and fugitive Edward Snowden hits heavy for those relatively uninformed about the titular character’s life and actions. However, for news-minded individuals, “Snowden” comes across as an uninspired, paint-by-numbers tale about love in the time of mass surveillance.

    Told in an awkward flash-back, flash-forward narrative structure, Stone’s film follows Snowden (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) as he comes to work for the CIA and later the NSA. He serves the country with the best of intentions for many years while falling in love with his longtime girlfriend, Lindsey Mills (Shailene Woodley). When Snowden is tasked with working on NSA surveillance programs targeting large numbers of U.S. citizens, he makes a break out of the country with highly classified intel in tow.

    More biopic than political thriller, Stone and co-screenwriter Kieran Fitzgerald opt to humanize the polarizing Snowden for audiences through a significantly developed love story with Mills. While this allows viewers to be better able to put themselves in Snowden’s shoes, it reinforces the dramatization of Snowden’s life story more so than an average biopic would. In this sense, “Snowden” becomes the cliff notes to a true person’s life story, the “Idiot’s Guide to NSA Surveillance” if you will.

    It feels like the intent of the filmmakers – and star Gordon-Levitt has spoken publically to this effect – that “Snowden” is simply a means through which audiences will begin a conversation about the issues raised in the film and do more research on their own. In this respect, the film takes a great deal of time dramatizing the filming of the Oscar-winning documentary “Citizenfour,” which shows a real-life Snowden working with journalists to expose secret government programs to the general public.

    Watching “Citizenfour” or seeing Snowden speak publically, it’s readily apparent how spot on Gordon-Levitt’s portrayal of the whistleblower truly is. He captures Snowden’s unique cadence and accent perfectly, adopting his eccentric mannerisms in a vividly imaginative performance. It’s unlikely that he will get major awards recognition for his efforts, especially given the subject, but Gordon-Levitt still turns in one of 2016’s best performances in an otherwise pedestrian film.

    After starting her career with terrific turns in independent films like “The Descendants” and “The Spectacular Now,” Woodley has been languishing away in franchise fodder through three “Divergent” movies before returning to drama with “Snowden.” 

    It’s evident that Woodley gives the role of Mills her full effort, especially during argument scenes opposite Gordon-Levitt. But the middling screenplay leaves Mills languishing from start to finish, operating simply as character witness for Stone’s hero-making effort for Snowden rather than her own unique character.

    “Snowden” boasts an impressive and deep supporting cast including Oscar winner Melissa Leo as documentarian Laura Poitras, Tom Wilkinson and Zachary Quinto as a pair of Guardian journalists and Rhys Ifans as Snowden’s mentor/boss with nefarious intentions. These performances all serve the narrative relatively well, but it’s Nicolas Cage’s outlandish casting and effort as a CIA trainer and friend that feels over the top and ridiculous. Nearly all of the actors in “Snowden” do an effective job of supporting Gordon-Levitt’s turn as Snowden, but Cage just brings the movie to a screeching halt in his limited screen time.

    For whatever reason, “Snowden” just doesn’t feel like an Oliver Stone movie. Frequently a risk taker with his films, Stone just takes the easiest road and plays the entire film pretty safe both visually and narratively in service of his obvious goal of lionizing Snowden as a whistleblowing patriot.

    The result is a disjointed, haphazard film that is probably better suited as a rental or streaming option several months from now rather than a film audiences need to rush out to theaters to see in spite of a terrific Gordon-Levitt performance.

    “Citizenfour,” the Oscar winning documentary highlighted in “Snowden,” comes highly recommended and should fill moviegoers’ Snowden needs until the Oliver Stone hero-making piece arrives in home video.